Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 5.2 V10 7AT (610 HP)
Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 · 2014 - present · Petrol
The Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 5.2 V10 7AT (610 HP) produces 610 hp and 560 Nm. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 3.2 seconds and reaches 325 km/h. Stated combined consumption is 12.5 l/100 km, equal to 290 g CO2 per km.
- Power
- 610 hp
- Torque
- 560 Nm
- 0–100
- 3.2 s
- Top speed
- 325 km/h
Engine
| Power | 610 hp |
|---|---|
| Power (kW) | 449 kW |
| Torque | 560 Nm |
| Displacement | 5,204 cc |
| Cylinders | V10 |
| Fuel system | Direct Fuel Injection |
| Fuel | Petrol |
Performance
| Top speed | 325 km/h |
|---|---|
| Acceleration 0–100 km/h | 3.2 s |
Fuel economy and emissions
| Combined consumption | 12.5 l/100 km |
|---|---|
| City consumption | 17.8 l/100 km |
| Highway consumption | 9.4 l/100 km |
| CO2 emissions | 290 g/km |
Transmission
| Gearbox | 7-Speed Dual-Clutch Transmission |
|---|---|
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive |
Dimensions and weight
| Length | 4,460 mm |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,923 mm |
| Height | 1,166 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm |
| Ground clearance | 135 mm |
| Unladen weight | 1,422 kg |
| Tyre size | 245/30 R20 || 305/30 R20 |
| Front brakes | Carbon Ceramic Ventilated Discs |
| Rear brakes | Carbon Ceramic Ventilated Discs |
How this trim compares to other cars
The Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 5.2 V10 7AT (610 HP) compared with 7,637 trims of other cars from the 2011–2017 period.
| Measure | This trim | Average | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp | 210 hp |
better than 99%
|
| Torque | 560 Nm | 339 Nm |
better than 90%
|
| Top speed | 325 km/h | 214 km/h |
better than 99%
|
| Acceleration 0–100 km/h | 3.2 s | 8.8 s |
better than 99%
|
| Combined consumption | 12.5 l/100 km | 6.6 l/100 km |
better than 4%
|
| CO2 emissions | 290 g/km | 147 g/km |
better than 2%
|
| Unladen weight | 1,422 kg | 1,571 kg |
better than 64%
|
Percentages show the share of trims from the same period this model beats on that measure. Manufacturer figures.
Not stated by the manufacturer: cargo volume. Those measures are left out of the comparison.