Cadillac CTS (2002 - 2014)
The Cadillac CTS is in the database with :models generations and body styles and 26 trims, built from 2002 - 2014. The most powerful trim makes 426 hp and belongs to the Cadillac CTS (2013 - present). The most recent generation is the Cadillac CTS (2013 - present), available in 5 trims.
- Generations
- 5
- Trims
- 26
- Production years
- 2002 - 2014
- Power
- 426 hp
CTS 2013 - present
5 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0L Turbo 6AT RWD (276 HP) | Petrol | 276 hp | 400 Nm | — | — | — | — | |
| 2.0L Turbo 6AT AWD (276 HP) | Petrol | 276 hp | 400 Nm | — | — | — | — | |
| 3.6L V6 6AT RWD (321 HP) | Petrol | 321 hp | 373 Nm | — | — | — | — | |
| 3.6L V6 6AT AWD (321 HP) | Petrol | 321 hp | 373 Nm | — | — | — | — | |
| 3.6L V6 Twin-Turbo 8AT RWD (426 HP) | Petrol | 426 hp | 583 Nm | — | — | — | — |
CTS Coupe 2011 - 2014
2 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.6L V6 RWD 6AT (322 HP) | Petrol | 322 hp | 373 Nm | 7.3 s | 233 km/h | 11.2 l/100 km | — | |
| 3.6L V6 AWD 6AT (322 HP) | Petrol | 322 hp | 373 Nm | 7.3 s | — | 11.2 l/100 km | — |
CTS Sport Wagon 2009 - 2014
3 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0L V6 6AT (276 HP) | Petrol | 276 hp | 302 Nm | 8.2 s | 225 km/h | 10.8 l/100 km | 249 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 6AT AWD (322 HP) | Petrol | 322 hp | 372 Nm | 6.7 s | 225 km/h | 10.6 l/100 km | 250 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 6AT (322 HP) | Petrol | 322 hp | 372 Nm | 6.3 s | 241 km/h | 10.4 l/100 km | 245 g/km |
CTS 2007 - 2013
8 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.8L V6 6AT RWD (211 HP) | Petrol | 213 hp | 263 Nm | 9.0 s | 204 km/h | — | 263 g/km | |
| 2.8L V6 6MT RWD (211 HP) | Petrol | 213 hp | 263 Nm | 8.3 s | 225 km/h | 10.2 l/100 km | 281 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 6MT RWD (261 HP) | Petrol | 261 hp | 342 Nm | — | — | 11.2 l/100 km | — | |
| 3.0L V6 6MT RWD (270 HP) | Petrol | 273 hp | 298 Nm | — | — | 9.8 l/100 km | — | |
| 3.6L V6 6MT RWD (304 HP) | Petrol | 305 hp | 342 Nm | — | 250 km/h | 11.2 l/100 km | — | |
| 3.6L V6 6AT AWD (311 HP) | Petrol | 311 hp | 374 Nm | 6.7 s | 241 km/h | 11.2 l/100 km | 267 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 6AT RWD (311 HP) | Petrol | 311 hp | 374 Nm | 6.3 s | 241 km/h | 11.1 l/100 km | 264 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 6MT RWD (311 HP) | Petrol | 311 hp | 374 Nm | 6.3 s | 249 km/h | 12.0 l/100 km | 285 g/km |
CTS 2002 - 2007
8 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.6L V6 5MT RWD (178 HP) | Petrol | 181 hp | 232 Nm | 9.3 s | 224 km/h | 10.3 l/100 km | 242 g/km | |
| 2.6L V6 5AT RWD (178 HP) | Petrol | 181 hp | 232 Nm | 9.7 s | 206 km/h | 10.7 l/100 km | 254 g/km | |
| 2.8L V6 5MT RWD (212 HP) | Petrol | 215 hp | 262 Nm | 8.2 s | 226 km/h | 11.9 l/100 km | 284 g/km | |
| 2.8L V6 5AT RWD (212 HP) | Petrol | 215 hp | 262 Nm | 8.4 s | 225 km/h | 11.7 l/100 km | 278 g/km | |
| 3.2L V6 5MT RWD (215 HP) | Petrol | 218 hp | 296 Nm | 7.4 s | 238 km/h | 11.0 l/100 km | 261 g/km | |
| 3.2L V6 5AT RWD (215 HP) | Petrol | 218 hp | 296 Nm | 7.7 s | 230 km/h | 11.7 l/100 km | 276 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 5MT RWD (253 HP) | Petrol | 257 hp | 340 Nm | 7.0 s | 241 km/h | 11.4 l/100 km | 269 g/km | |
| 3.6L V6 5AT RWD (253 HP) | Petrol | 257 hp | 340 Nm | 7.0 s | 233 km/h | 11.6 l/100 km | 275 g/km |
Is Cadillac CTS a good choice against other models?
Average across every Cadillac CTS trim, compared with 7,612 trims of other cars from the 2010–2016 period.
| Measure | This model | Average | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 324 hp | 207 hp |
better than 85%
|
| Torque | 426 Nm | 336 Nm |
better than 79%
|
| Cargo volume | 388 l | 465 l |
better than 37%
|
| Unladen weight | 1,640 kg | 1,575 kg |
better than 34%
|
Percentages show the share of trims from the same period this model beats on that measure. Manufacturer figures.
Not stated by the manufacturer: top speed, acceleration 0–100 km/h, combined consumption and co2 emissions. Those measures are left out of the comparison.
