KTM X-Bow (2008 - present)
The KTM X-Bow is in the database with :models generations and body styles and 4 trims, built from 2008 - present. The most powerful trim makes 300 hp and belongs to the KTM X-Bow R (2011 - present). The most recent generation is the KTM X-Bow GT (2013 - present), available in 1 trims.
- Generations
- 4
- Trims
- 4
- Production years
- 2008 - present
- Power
- 300 hp
X-Bow GT 2013 - present
1 trim
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 6MT (285 HP) | Petrol | 285 hp | 420 Nm | 4.1 s | 232 km/h | 8.3 l/100 km | 189 g/km |
X-Bow RR 2012 - present
1 trim
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 6MT (N/A) | Petrol | — | — | — | — | — | — |
X-Bow R 2011 - present
1 trim
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 6MT (300 HP) | Petrol | 300 hp | 400 Nm | 3.9 s | 232 km/h | 8.3 l/100 km | 189 g/km |
X-Bow 2008 - present
1 trim
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R 2.0L 6MT (240 HP) | Petrol | 240 hp | 310 Nm | 3.9 s | 220 km/h | 7.9 l/100 km | 187 g/km |
Is KTM X-Bow GT a good choice against other models?
Average across every KTM X-Bow GT trim, compared with 7,616 trims of other cars from the 2010–2016 period.
| Measure | This model | Average | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp | 207 hp |
better than 79%
|
| Torque | 420 Nm | 336 Nm |
better than 78%
|
| Top speed | 232 km/h | 213 km/h |
better than 72%
|
| Acceleration 0–100 km/h | 4.1 s | 9.0 s |
better than 97%
|
| Combined consumption | 8.3 l/100 km | 6.7 l/100 km |
better than 20%
|
| CO2 emissions | 189 g/km | 150 g/km |
better than 15%
|
| Unladen weight | 847 kg | 1,576 kg |
better than 99%
|
Percentages show the share of trims from the same period this model beats on that measure. Manufacturer figures.
Not stated by the manufacturer: cargo volume. Those measures are left out of the comparison.
