Eagle Summit (1992 - 1996)
The Eagle Summit is in the database with :models generations and body styles and 9 trims, built from 1992 - 1996. The most powerful trim makes 136 hp and belongs to the Eagle Summit Wagon (1992 - 1996). The most recent generation is the Eagle Summit (1993 - 1996), available in 3 trims.
- Generations
- 2
- Trims
- 9
- Production years
- 1992 - 1996
- Power
- 136 hp
Summit 1993 - 1996
3 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5L 12V 5MT (92 HP) | Petrol | 92 hp | 126 Nm | — | — | 6.7 l/100 km | — | |
| 1.8i 16V 4AT (116 HP) | Petrol | 116 hp | 158 Nm | — | — | 7.9 l/100 km | — | |
| 1.8i 16V 5MT (116 HP) | Petrol | 116 hp | 158 Nm | — | — | 7.9 l/100 km | — |
Summit Wagon 1992 - 1996
6 trims
| Trim | Fuel | Power | Torque | 0–100 | Top speed | Fuel economy | CO2 | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8i 16V 4AT (116 HP) | Petrol | 116 hp | 158 Nm | — | — | 9.3 l/100 km | — | |
| 1.8i 16V 5MT (116 HP) | Petrol | 116 hp | 158 Nm | — | — | 9.3 l/100 km | — | |
| 2.4i 4AT (118 HP) | Petrol | 118 hp | 184 Nm | — | — | 9.9 l/100 km | — | |
| 2.4i 5MT (118 HP) | Petrol | 118 hp | 184 Nm | — | — | 11.2 l/100 km | — | |
| 2.4i 16V 4AT AWD (136 HP) | Petrol | 136 hp | 197 Nm | — | — | 11.2 l/100 km | — | |
| 2.4i 16V 5MT AWD (136 HP) | Petrol | 136 hp | 197 Nm | — | — | 11.2 l/100 km | — |
Is Eagle Summit a good choice against other models?
Average across every Eagle Summit trim, compared with 2,558 trims of other cars from the 1990–1996 period.
| Measure | This model | Average | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 108 hp | 140 hp |
better than 37%
|
| Torque | 147 Nm | 211 Nm |
better than 29%
|
| Combined consumption | 7.5 l/100 km | 8.8 l/100 km |
better than 69%
|
| Unladen weight | 946 kg | 1,310 kg |
better than 92%
|
Percentages show the share of trims from the same period this model beats on that measure. Manufacturer figures.
Not stated by the manufacturer: top speed, acceleration 0–100 km/h, co2 emissions and cargo volume. Those measures are left out of the comparison.